www.mljewish.org |
Mail.Liberal-Judaism |
| Volume 4 Number 2 | Tue Jul 5 23:55:05 1994 |
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 1994 20:29:20 -0700 From: Adina S Levin <alevin@world.std.com> Subject: 9 Av Interpretations I would like to seek information about contemporary interpretations of Tisha B'Av. I have always had some trouble with the day as traditionally practiced. How does one mourn the destruction of Jerusalem when cranes and earthmovers are rumbling through the Old City? How is 9 Av interpreted by Jews who do not hope to restore a theocracy in Israel? Does anyone have sources they can recommend, or stories they can share about observances, and liturgies for Tisha B'Av. Thanks, ASL
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 15:08:11 -0700 From: peter@seattleu.edu (Peter Mark) Subject: Re: Bilaam the Psychic Fool On Mon, 27 Jun 94, Rabbi Steve Gindi <RabiSteve@aol.com> wrote a note about Bilaam the psychic fool. His original comments are preceded with the ">" symbol, my responses and questions are interspersed. Rabbi Gindi begins: > Part of the importance of the giving of the Torah to the Jews was to prove > that the gentiles of the time were mistaken in everything they believed in. I find the above sentence objectionable for several reasons. First, it asserts knowledge of God's purposes. Even if God exists, it seems highly unlikely that any mortal could ever know his/her purposes. Second, it assumes that the Torah is in fact the divine revelation of God, rather than the work of human authors writing to satisfy human needs. (The latter possibility strikes me as the more likely, since I base my beliefs on physical evidence and not on religious faith.) Third, claiming that the "gentiles of the time were mistaken in everything they believed" seems a bit exaggerated, to say the least. The effect is to dehumanize, perhaps even to demonize all individuals of another culture. I suspect the authors of the relevant passages of the Torah did this to justify the wholesale slaughter (described in detail in the Torah) of the various gentile tribes who were (inconveniently, for the Israelites) living in Canaan at the time. Perhaps you could elaborate your claim that "the gentiles of the time were mistaken in everything they believed." As it stands, the passages suggests a virulent strain of ethnic chauvinism that lacks justification. > They believed that with the correct nonsensical incantation you can change > G-d's will. This is a charge that could equally be levelled at any person of any faith who prays to any deity. Dismissing the prayers of another culture as "nonsensical incantations" (while presumably considering the prayers of one's own culture as highly sensible). Pick any prayer from the Jewish liturgy that asks God to bring peace and prosperity to the people of Israel. Why isn't this any more an "incantation" than the prayers of the gentiles? > The fact is that no incantations or sacrifices can affect a change in G-d's > will. That is what we learn from our [Torah -- I'm guessing the Hebrew] The Torah details how the Israelite culture of the time was based on animal sacrifices, and how the society was stratified into a class system in which the priestly class (the cohens and levites) intoned a variety of "incantations" (or should I say "prayers" ... what's the difference?) over sacrificed animals in a belief that this would please God. This would appear to contradict your above assertion. > special location which had magical powers at a special time and gave a > tremendous amount of oxen as sacrifices. G-d made him bless the Jews > instead. This story repeated itself at different places with better blessing > for the Jews each time. [I've deleted here a parable about a willful angel, a talking donkey, and a character named Bilaam who has powers to curse and bless, and a special location with magical powers.] > There is no doubt that Bilaam had supernatural powers. His predictions were > accurate and his blessings or curses would always come true. Please clarify: do you really believe that this story is *literally true*, not just parable intended by its authors to be understood metaphorically? > Dir Aalah is in the Jordan valley, which is now part of the Jericho Autonomy > region. There Archeologists have uncovered a plaster with a prophecy of > Bilaam. This prophecy is not in the Bible. In this plaster we see the very > same Bilaam prophesying in service of certain gentiles in the name of some > Idol. There should be no doubt that the gentile prophet is the same person > as in the Bible. Why not? And even if the two are the same, so what? Peter Mark peter@seattleu.edu
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 1994 14:29:50 -0700 From: Jonathan Mark <jsmark@aol.com> Subject: Korah and Midrash In discussing a midrash on Korah, Rabbi Steve Gindi writes (Volume 3 Number 174): >The intent of these fiery words is to say to Moshe that if the whole >community is holy, how come you are the king and your brother is high priest? >Moshe did not answer the questions addressed to him because Korah was not >interested in hearing a true answer. He only wanted to usurp authority. This midrash also teaches us a lesson on the proper way to behave towards someone who is being verbally antagonistic. Do not respond to the specifics of what they say. They are not interested in reasoning with you anyway. This is true with respect to one's personal life, and also with respect to public life. [And it also works quite well on USENET, in particular on s.c.j -- Yr. Mod. :-)] In the July 1, 1994 issue of _Forward_, the playwright David Mamet says "Explanation, reason and, importantly, tolerance in respect to anti-Semitism are disastrous for us." I feel that the response of Jewish organizations to Louis Farrakhan has given him millions of dollars worth of free publicity, and does not harm him with his intended audience at all. It would be better if Jews could learn a lesson from this midrash and combat him without responding to him directly, just as Moses did not respond to Korah. Jonathan Mark
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 05:10:58 -0700 From: Sherman Kaplan <Sherman_Kaplan@cpsnet2.cps.edu> Subject: Lack of Faith/Loss of Faith To the rabbi he posted on the subject of lack or loss of faith, I have no problem in discussing my feelings on the subject. While I recognize what seems to be a deep human need for a "spiritual" existance and identity, my common sense tells me that the god to which Jews traditionally have prayed does not exist with any of the attributes we apply to him. As to whether there really is a directing creative force in the Universe, how can anyone know? Certainly, there is no just god in the sense which judaism (or other monotheistic faiths) teach; one need only look around at the human condition for evidence of that. At the risk of over simplifying a complex subject, my lack of faith really boils down to The Holocaust and the feeling that a god who really cared, would not have allowed such a thing to happen. And, if some suggest that this was punishment for past sins, thank you but I want no part of such a belief. My Judaism remains cultural, ethical and historical, not theological. Someone once asked me whether I beleived in an afterlife. I said I had no idea what happens, but I firmly beleive that if I live this life well, the next one will take care of itself. BTW, for those of you who are committed theists, I do nto mean to insult or challange your beliefs. A beauty of Judaism is (or should be) its wide diversity and toleration for all beliefs, and doubts.
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 1994 16:02:23 -0700 From: Rabbi Andrew M Sacks <mssing@pluto.mscc.huji.ac.il> Subject: Liberal Jewish Marriages in Israel There was a supreme court decision handed down in Israel this past week which may be of interest to our readers. I hope this is not considered Political -- although in Israel it is difficult to separate religion and politics. The courts have upheld the legal validity of marriages performed in foreign consulates in Israel if at least one of the partners has duel citizenship. This means that a couple can be married civilly at an embassy, rather than going abroad to Cyprus for their civil ceremony. They can then arrange to be married by the rabbi of their choice (including Reform or Conservative) in a religious ceremony. Unfortunately The USA has no federal marriage laws (only state by state) so the US consulate is not one where weddings will take place. Rabbi Andrew M. Sacks (Jerusalem)
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 07:28:54 -0700 From: Jeffrey Cohen <JC924@albany.albany.edu> Subject: Locating Old Friends A friend of mine is trying to locate some old friends. Unfortunately, he has very little information, so I offered to help him by posting this request on m.l-j. He is looking for Harry and/or David Hachen (or Haiken or Haichen). At least one of them lives (or lived) in Cincinnati and at least one of them is (or was) a rabbi. Does anyone know them or how to get in touch with either one of them? My friend is going to be in Cincinnati soon and would like to look them up.
Date: Sun, 3 Jul 1994 11:54:49 -0700 From: lschweit@stu.athabascau.ca (Lawerence D. Schweitz) Subject: Sense of Community for Singles I was at Shul on Firday, and a friend of mine, who is contenplating conversion had noticed that single people in general in our Shul don't have a sense of community like the families. We are a small liberal congregation, and our numbers are usually increased by conversions. I have become a Jew-By-Choice recently myself; however, some people like myself have no problems fitting into the community. My question to you is: do the single members of your congregation have a sense of community? I would like some feedback from singles and others on this subject. Lawerence D. Schweitz
Date: Tue, 5 Jul 1994 01:44:48 -0700 From: feldmhs2@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu (Howard Feldmesser) Subject: Re: Synagogue Dues Structure It seems that each synagogue has it's own method. We use a combination dues structure developed many years ago (a time when I was serving on the Board of Directors or as an officer, so I have some first hand knowledge of the thought process that went into the structure). Initially, we had a fixed dues level for each "household" regardless of income or number of family members. Since we had no religious school or other amenities, this seemed appropriate. We then discovered, as our needs as a Temple increased (translation: costs went up), that some could not afford it. We then instituted the "reduced dues" concept mentioned in an earlier post using the same private methods that the other synagogue uses. Later, after further increases in dues were necessary, we added a tier structure. New members, singles, seniors, and senior singles each have their own dues payment. We also do an annual "personal giving" campaign to ask those who can pay more to do so. This last step is to avoid the system often referred to as "fair share dues" where the congregant pays according to the family taxable income, which we felt would lead to massive mistrust, discontent, and the rest of the effects we though of as horrible. So far our system seems to be working albeit with a momentary glitch caused by an influx of Russian Jewish immigrants who have large programmatic needs and small (usually zero for a significant length of time) incomes. No system is perfect. It's interesting to see other solutions to the same problem. Howard S. Feldmesser feldmhs2@aplcomm.jhuapl.edu feldmhs1@teomail.jhuapl.edu
Submissions should be mailed to either submit@mljewish.org or mlj@shamash.org. Please clearly mark your submission as a submission, and include either a relevant subject line or a reference to the issue to which you are replying.
If you would like to subscribe to MLJ, please complete the Subscription Request Form, or send a message to the moderator (listmgt@mljewish.org) requesting to be added to the list. Please include your first and last names in your request.
Backissues may be obtained by Email by completing a Backissue by Email Request Form. A specific backissue may be retrieved interactively by completing a Request Form.
Publishing any of the mail.liberal-judaism digests or portions thereof on any other medium including soc.culture.jewish without consulting the moderator and/or the originator of the article represents a breach of trust. Please remember why this list was created and that contributers may not want to discuss the "correctness" of their beliefs from your point of view. Also note that many of the people who write in wish their privacy preserved. Thank you for your cooperation with these restrictions.
"It is not our task as liberal Jews to complain about the Orthodox attitude or to be bullied by it, but rather to choose our legitimate path according to the inner logic and development of liberal Judaism" (Rabbi Walter Jacob)
| Previous Issue: v4n1 | Next Issue: v4n3 | |
MLJ Home Page
|
Return to Retrieval Form |   |